GreatGetsby
Member
Richard Jewell, a movie based on a true story, is very touching and shows the director's steady control ability. Even if the plot is in the foreseeable category, I am still impressed by the storytelling of the movie. We need films like Richard Jewell to remind us of the abuse of power by the government and the media.
If you become a suspect in the case, your actions will be over-interpreted by people. All your normal behaviors are your disguise, and all your "abnormal" behaviors are your criminal evidence in their eyes. They did not have evidence, nor did they investigate the case based on the evidence, but reverse the evidence based on the conclusion.
Because the media has publicized the FBI suspecting that Richard is a criminal, if Richard is not a criminal, it will appear that the FBI's ability to handle the case is too poor, so the FBI is unwilling to admit that they have no evidence, and must force Richard to admit things that he did not done. The media doesn't care about the truth at all, they only care about sales and popularity.
The male lead was chosen very well, and the surface seemed simple, but he always insisted on his outlook on life. He may have many problems in life or personality, but he strives to defend his justice. Sam Rockwell's performance is really different every time and really amazing.
Some people will say that the image of the female reporter in the Richard Jewell movie is discrediting women and the professional ethics of the media, but I think this should be a kind of irony for the director. How was the news inside an FBI known by a female reporter?
Whether it is a hero or a suspect, whoever has the right to speak has the final say. The FBI does not have any direct evidence. With the round LOGO in the office, by writing a report on the side and inducing Richard to sign a recording, you can injustice a person. The dialogue between Richard and Agent FBI at the end of the Richard Jewell movie was impressive: If someone like Richard is arrested after being wronged, and will encounter similar situations in the future, will anyone come forward?
If you become a suspect in the case, your actions will be over-interpreted by people. All your normal behaviors are your disguise, and all your "abnormal" behaviors are your criminal evidence in their eyes. They did not have evidence, nor did they investigate the case based on the evidence, but reverse the evidence based on the conclusion.
Because the media has publicized the FBI suspecting that Richard is a criminal, if Richard is not a criminal, it will appear that the FBI's ability to handle the case is too poor, so the FBI is unwilling to admit that they have no evidence, and must force Richard to admit things that he did not done. The media doesn't care about the truth at all, they only care about sales and popularity.
The male lead was chosen very well, and the surface seemed simple, but he always insisted on his outlook on life. He may have many problems in life or personality, but he strives to defend his justice. Sam Rockwell's performance is really different every time and really amazing.
Some people will say that the image of the female reporter in the Richard Jewell movie is discrediting women and the professional ethics of the media, but I think this should be a kind of irony for the director. How was the news inside an FBI known by a female reporter?
Whether it is a hero or a suspect, whoever has the right to speak has the final say. The FBI does not have any direct evidence. With the round LOGO in the office, by writing a report on the side and inducing Richard to sign a recording, you can injustice a person. The dialogue between Richard and Agent FBI at the end of the Richard Jewell movie was impressive: If someone like Richard is arrested after being wronged, and will encounter similar situations in the future, will anyone come forward?
