What are the advantages of Roku as a smart TV Box?

Amnesia

Member
Roku's advantage lies in integration, it is a platform. As far as it is concerned, Roku does not provide content but selling hardware. But in the long run, given that Roku's current stock in the United States is second only to Apple TV in the OTT market, the platform is bigger, and it may be very big to want to do something. Roku's attempt at the game is a sign.

Roku's advantage

Roku's advantage of being a platform and entrance is a dirty job, especially in a market like the United States. Convincing content service providers to join is often a laborious and time-consuming task. In the long run, both platform type (Roku) and content type (Amazon, etc.) will exist. With a single platform, ARPU is not high, and it is always working for others; just providing its own content will not meet the needs, and the two will also be largely integrated.

As far as the domestic market is concerned, the Roku model already exists. In fact, the early OTT market, including the current cottage box, followed Roku's path. In the regular army, due to the restrictions of a certain judicial regulation, it is impossible to completely copy Roku, and Xiaomi has paid a naughty price. However, domestic content services are not as scattered and diversified as the United States. Relatively and intensively, even if it is released, it is impossible to form hundreds of content service apps like Roku.

Roku's advantage

Roku's low-cost general volume model is not uncommon. Roku's focus on products, SKU control, target user grasp, and ecological planning are worth learning. Every regular army has the heart of being an emperor, and wants to grasp the top of the value chain by itself, but the products are sparse, the content services are also sparse, and the integration capabilities are not enough.

Finally, I found that although the United States does not have radio and television, Roku encounters greater resistance than radio and television.
 
Top