Jamsbond
Member
Today, let's talk about Sony's panel. Sony will not buy screen modules directly from the third party now, but only LCD substrates. The optical film and backlight unit are Sony's own, and Sony reprocesses them into a complete set of panel modules. Sony mainly purchases LCD substrates of Samsung, LG and AUO. Pay attention to LCD substrates instead of panel modules.
At present, the VA base plate of general small and medium-sized screen uses Samsung, 75, 85va base plate generally uses AUO, and there are also Innolux 75 base plate , which is the former Chimei.
As for IPS screens, LG is the only one. So we know what substrates g and H use in the market.
LCD substrate itself has never been better than that of Samsung in Taiwan, just to see the final specifications.
The quality of TV depends on hardware and software algorithm. Hardware is screen, module and image quality chip. Software is algorithm. According to my cognition, LCD substrate accounts for 30%, optical film and backlight module, and partition drive accounts for 70%. As for OLED, we all know that we purchase OLED modules with LGD, but in the new year it is not so simple.
In fact, the difference between Sony A8H and Sony A9G is almost the same in hardware configuration.
It's all X1 flagship. But this is actually something on the surface. There are actually two differences between them. There is a reason why Sony A8H is defined as 8 series instead of A9H.
The difference of software algorithm is only known by the manufacturer of the factory. Only through our evaluation can we know the difference between it and A9G. As for the big change of screen module, I guess it's from Korean module to OLED module of 8.5 generation line of domestic Guangzhou factory. This is the main reason why it's called A8H, but whether it's good or bad after the change, or whether it needs to be actually watched and described.
But I believe that with Sony's software strength, it will not make its OLED products worse at this time, because in fact, it is still in the promotion period of OLED. So you don't have to worry about it. It's still subject to my assessment and explanation. So here on the screen, we all know what's going on? So why do people always say that other brands look like high contrast in the store.
In fact, you really don't know Sony, it is actually a very stubborn and traditional brand. Sony actually pays more attention to screen life from the very beginning, which is one of them. Then we have a very serious misunderstanding, which is not that the higher the contrast, the better. Even Samsung, when you go home to use a more restored movie mode, will also significantly reduce the contrast to achieve a certain balance between human eye observation comfort and screen loss.
So what's the matter with Sony? Sony has been trying to restore from the very beginning. Considering from the source, the original contrast of the original signal source is not high. It's impossible for you to be extremely sharp in debugging, and so is Sony. It won't deliberately use debugging's extremely sharp in the highlighted environment. Now the bright pattern you see in the store is actually a compromise. In fact, the optical film and backlight inside are also complex.
At present, the VA base plate of general small and medium-sized screen uses Samsung, 75, 85va base plate generally uses AUO, and there are also Innolux 75 base plate , which is the former Chimei.
As for IPS screens, LG is the only one. So we know what substrates g and H use in the market.
LCD substrate itself has never been better than that of Samsung in Taiwan, just to see the final specifications.
The quality of TV depends on hardware and software algorithm. Hardware is screen, module and image quality chip. Software is algorithm. According to my cognition, LCD substrate accounts for 30%, optical film and backlight module, and partition drive accounts for 70%. As for OLED, we all know that we purchase OLED modules with LGD, but in the new year it is not so simple.
In fact, the difference between Sony A8H and Sony A9G is almost the same in hardware configuration.
It's all X1 flagship. But this is actually something on the surface. There are actually two differences between them. There is a reason why Sony A8H is defined as 8 series instead of A9H.
The difference of software algorithm is only known by the manufacturer of the factory. Only through our evaluation can we know the difference between it and A9G. As for the big change of screen module, I guess it's from Korean module to OLED module of 8.5 generation line of domestic Guangzhou factory. This is the main reason why it's called A8H, but whether it's good or bad after the change, or whether it needs to be actually watched and described.
But I believe that with Sony's software strength, it will not make its OLED products worse at this time, because in fact, it is still in the promotion period of OLED. So you don't have to worry about it. It's still subject to my assessment and explanation. So here on the screen, we all know what's going on? So why do people always say that other brands look like high contrast in the store.
In fact, you really don't know Sony, it is actually a very stubborn and traditional brand. Sony actually pays more attention to screen life from the very beginning, which is one of them. Then we have a very serious misunderstanding, which is not that the higher the contrast, the better. Even Samsung, when you go home to use a more restored movie mode, will also significantly reduce the contrast to achieve a certain balance between human eye observation comfort and screen loss.
So what's the matter with Sony? Sony has been trying to restore from the very beginning. Considering from the source, the original contrast of the original signal source is not high. It's impossible for you to be extremely sharp in debugging, and so is Sony. It won't deliberately use debugging's extremely sharp in the highlighted environment. Now the bright pattern you see in the store is actually a compromise. In fact, the optical film and backlight inside are also complex.
