akagi1945
Member
Compared with the open ending movie, I personally prefer this to be an ending movie, and the ending appears very early
Like the former staff with dogs, the chef who also did n’t know that many people were hungry thought the milk was sent back because of a hair. After comparing the hair of several chefs, he reprimanded the suspected chef. It is the end of the whole story.
(Of course, some people will question, why is the chef so naive? Has n’t he seen the bloody feces of the platform for so long? In the film, there is a waiter holding the lens of the food, the kitchen is only responsible for the food. It ’s not their job to produce food, give food to guests, and tidy up the tables and chairs after a meal. Besides, if you ’ve seen the platform, what's the point of spending so much effort to make the food exquisite?)
The ending of the milk freeze is different from the ending of the little girl. It is a complete tragedy. The whole film is constantly striking the audience, aside from the bright and anti-communist. The complaint of “root dissatisfaction”, middle-level people do not know the grief of the lower level, (information is intercepted by uninformed middle-level decision makers, it can be said that they are not sent to the informed upper-level people at all). Like a deep-sea earthquake, when it reached the sea, it was just a small wave, sad and ridiculous.
I think that the little girl on the 333th floor does not exist, it is the fantasy of the male owner. Why does the male owner have this fantasy? The previous Spring Dream has hinted that the male owner has a good opinion of Asian women, perhaps because he hopes that she, like himself, has not been completely turned into a madman with no reason to kill by this prison, but is a mother who is desperately seeking his children. .
However, because the fantasy plot of the male host at the end of the film accounts for too much, many people will think that the girl is real, but in fact, including the information that the female staff told the male, it is also clear that the room does not heat up and cool down. The food was sent back to the 0th floor, and the male owner stayed in the room and died in fantasy.
Many friends questioned why the little girl definitely does not exist, because many assumptions about the existence of the little girl require the audience to use the information that does not exist in the film to rationalize her, but the plot is nowhere to be found. The imagination of the audience, just discuss some of the content of the plot to analyze why the little girl does not exist.
1: Is the woman looking for a child really looking for a child?
The male owner only heard in the old man ’s mouth that the woman was looking for a child, and the woman remained silent throughout the film (there was a cold saying that she was not dumb), and it was not excluded that the prisoners watched her come down every time.
The obvious negation in the play is her real identity directly spoken by the former staff
Like the former staff with dogs, the chef who also did n’t know that many people were hungry thought the milk was sent back because of a hair. After comparing the hair of several chefs, he reprimanded the suspected chef. It is the end of the whole story.
(Of course, some people will question, why is the chef so naive? Has n’t he seen the bloody feces of the platform for so long? In the film, there is a waiter holding the lens of the food, the kitchen is only responsible for the food. It ’s not their job to produce food, give food to guests, and tidy up the tables and chairs after a meal. Besides, if you ’ve seen the platform, what's the point of spending so much effort to make the food exquisite?)
The ending of the milk freeze is different from the ending of the little girl. It is a complete tragedy. The whole film is constantly striking the audience, aside from the bright and anti-communist. The complaint of “root dissatisfaction”, middle-level people do not know the grief of the lower level, (information is intercepted by uninformed middle-level decision makers, it can be said that they are not sent to the informed upper-level people at all). Like a deep-sea earthquake, when it reached the sea, it was just a small wave, sad and ridiculous.
I think that the little girl on the 333th floor does not exist, it is the fantasy of the male owner. Why does the male owner have this fantasy? The previous Spring Dream has hinted that the male owner has a good opinion of Asian women, perhaps because he hopes that she, like himself, has not been completely turned into a madman with no reason to kill by this prison, but is a mother who is desperately seeking his children. .
However, because the fantasy plot of the male host at the end of the film accounts for too much, many people will think that the girl is real, but in fact, including the information that the female staff told the male, it is also clear that the room does not heat up and cool down. The food was sent back to the 0th floor, and the male owner stayed in the room and died in fantasy.
Many friends questioned why the little girl definitely does not exist, because many assumptions about the existence of the little girl require the audience to use the information that does not exist in the film to rationalize her, but the plot is nowhere to be found. The imagination of the audience, just discuss some of the content of the plot to analyze why the little girl does not exist.
1: Is the woman looking for a child really looking for a child?
The male owner only heard in the old man ’s mouth that the woman was looking for a child, and the woman remained silent throughout the film (there was a cold saying that she was not dumb), and it was not excluded that the prisoners watched her come down every time.
The obvious negation in the play is her real identity directly spoken by the former staff