Tyler123
Member
I started this because my sister asked me to find a TV for her spare room and gave me a hard ceiling of $350. That put three sets in play: the Hisense 55E6QF at $297.97, the Samsung U8000H 50-inch at $329.99, and the same Samsung in 55 inches at $347.99. Then I noticed the two Samsung listings both show 4.2 stars from 323 ratings. Same count, same score, different screen sizes. That is one product page split in two, not two products with their own track record, and it makes the 323 number close to meaningless for judging either size.
The Hisense is the only one of the three where the listing actually names a panel technology. QLED, Hi-QLED in Hisense's wording, plus Dolby Vision, HDR10+ Adaptive and a motion rate of 120. The Samsung pair say Crystal UHD and Crystal Processor 4K, which is Samsung's label for a standard LED panel, and neither listing names a single HDR format. On a $300-ish set that gap matters more than brand. Dolby Vision on the Hisense is a real, checkable feature. "Color Booster" and "Motion Xcelerator" are not specs, they are names for processing modes, and the listing gives no numbers behind either one.
The 1322 ratings on the Hisense against 323 on the Samsung pair is also the more useful signal here, even allowing for the fact that a cheaper set sells in bigger volume. It is a longer history. The Hisense listing also shows 2K+ bought in the past month, which tells you it is moving fast enough that you are not buying a discontinued orphan.
What you actually pay for with the Samsungs is the panel size at 50 inches if that is all the wall takes, and the Tizen software, which most people find easier to live with than Fire TV. The 55-inch Samsung is $50 more than the Hisense for the same diagonal and less panel tech. I cannot justify that for a spare room. If someone in the house is a heavy Samsung phone or SmartThings user, the ecosystem argument is real and I would not argue against it.
Where I would push back on all three: none of these listings give peak brightness, contrast, or a real refresh rate in Hz, so nobody in this thread can honestly tell you how they handle a dark scene or a 60fps game. "Motion Rate 120" and "Motion Xcelerator" are both processing claims, not native panel specs.
For a bright spare room on a $350 budget I would take the Hisense and pocket the $50. For a main TV in a room where you care about blacks, I would skip all three and save up.
Has anyone here actually put a colorimeter or even a phone lux meter on the E6QF and the U8000H side by side? I want to know if the QLED layer is doing anything visible at this price or if it is just a label.
What the listings say (as of Sep 29)
The Hisense is the only one of the three where the listing actually names a panel technology. QLED, Hi-QLED in Hisense's wording, plus Dolby Vision, HDR10+ Adaptive and a motion rate of 120. The Samsung pair say Crystal UHD and Crystal Processor 4K, which is Samsung's label for a standard LED panel, and neither listing names a single HDR format. On a $300-ish set that gap matters more than brand. Dolby Vision on the Hisense is a real, checkable feature. "Color Booster" and "Motion Xcelerator" are not specs, they are names for processing modes, and the listing gives no numbers behind either one.
The 1322 ratings on the Hisense against 323 on the Samsung pair is also the more useful signal here, even allowing for the fact that a cheaper set sells in bigger volume. It is a longer history. The Hisense listing also shows 2K+ bought in the past month, which tells you it is moving fast enough that you are not buying a discontinued orphan.
What you actually pay for with the Samsungs is the panel size at 50 inches if that is all the wall takes, and the Tizen software, which most people find easier to live with than Fire TV. The 55-inch Samsung is $50 more than the Hisense for the same diagonal and less panel tech. I cannot justify that for a spare room. If someone in the house is a heavy Samsung phone or SmartThings user, the ecosystem argument is real and I would not argue against it.
Where I would push back on all three: none of these listings give peak brightness, contrast, or a real refresh rate in Hz, so nobody in this thread can honestly tell you how they handle a dark scene or a 60fps game. "Motion Rate 120" and "Motion Xcelerator" are both processing claims, not native panel specs.
For a bright spare room on a $350 budget I would take the Hisense and pocket the $50. For a main TV in a room where you care about blacks, I would skip all three and save up.
Has anyone here actually put a colorimeter or even a phone lux meter on the E6QF and the U8000H side by side? I want to know if the QLED layer is doing anything visible at this price or if it is just a label.
What the listings say (as of Sep 29)
| Spec | Hisense Store | Samsung Store | Samsung Store |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $297.97 | $329.99 | $347.99 |
| Amazon rating | 4.3 (1322 ratings) | 4.2 (323 ratings) | 4.2 (323 ratings) |
| Bestseller rank | #19 | #13 | #12 |
